aspireus
05-19 03:54 PM
I got my I 140 approved under Eb3 if i get another job and transfer my I 140 can i use my old PD if my new employer applies in EB2 ?
wallpaper Amphitheater / Summerfest
inetuser
01-04 01:59 PM
I applied for 485 under july-07 bulletin and received my AP and EAD though I have not used it yet.
Now I got married and my wife is USC. I would like to apply for 485 based on marriage.
So before applying for marriage based 485, do I need to revoke employment based 485 application or I can have two 485 applications (from two different categories) at the same time? Do I need to revoke AP and EAD also received from employment based?
Also I assume that I need to maintain same A# (got from emploment based application) for marriage based 485 application also.
If I don't need to revoke employment based AP and EAD, then can I use these while my family based 485 application is pending?
I appreciate your help
Now I got married and my wife is USC. I would like to apply for 485 based on marriage.
So before applying for marriage based 485, do I need to revoke employment based 485 application or I can have two 485 applications (from two different categories) at the same time? Do I need to revoke AP and EAD also received from employment based?
Also I assume that I need to maintain same A# (got from emploment based application) for marriage based 485 application also.
If I don't need to revoke employment based AP and EAD, then can I use these while my family based 485 application is pending?
I appreciate your help
greencard_fever
02-05 03:18 PM
I had the soft LUD on my I129 which was approved in Nov 2007.
2011 Summer Fest Grounds
aries
10-29 01:55 PM
bumping to get some responses.
more...
txh1b
08-27 11:53 AM
To retain the PD, you would need the copy of the I140. Without that, there isn't much that can be done when you switch companies to keep your PD.
brahmam
06-13 06:58 PM
Now that all are current, and we know the many benefits of an EAD ( primary being spousal employment) what exactly are the no-nos to apply for 485?
1. Even if you want to change jobs after 6 months, you gotta stick to the same position in the new company?
2. Any restrictions on travel?
3. Yearly EAD renewal can be a headache?
Any more?
P.S: Guys, I am as elated as any of you but just wanted some perspective before pushing my employer.
1. Even if you want to change jobs after 6 months, you gotta stick to the same position in the new company?
2. Any restrictions on travel?
3. Yearly EAD renewal can be a headache?
Any more?
P.S: Guys, I am as elated as any of you but just wanted some perspective before pushing my employer.
more...
paskal
01-25 09:17 PM
don't graduate till the summer semester
stay and take a course
or arrange to have CPT
or just go home and enjoy 3 mnths, your H1B will be stamped in the proccess
you application must be amended not to say adustment of status (in the US), the approval can be sent to your local consulate
or go on an O-1 if you can qualify....
stay and take a course
or arrange to have CPT
or just go home and enjoy 3 mnths, your H1B will be stamped in the proccess
you application must be amended not to say adustment of status (in the US), the approval can be sent to your local consulate
or go on an O-1 if you can qualify....
2010 Summerfest Grounds
gcwait2007
05-01 03:00 PM
Congrats...
more...
rkumar28
09-24 06:12 PM
To Experts and Attorneys,
I have a question regarding AC21 portibility. I got my EAD in Oct 12th 2007. In the labor(used a pre-approved labor), the base pay mentioned is 48K and I was getting paid 55K from my current employer(A) who filed my green card.
I am getting another job in company (B) in the same field. The salary offer is better but is very high than mentioned in my labor. The new salary is around 85K.
1) Will the high salary will cause any issue with green card process if I take AC21 and use my EAD. Anyone had this kind of experience with the salary difference.
2) How do I know my new job is in the same or similar category as defined by USCIS.
3) Is AC21 is safe to take.
Thanks.....
I have a question regarding AC21 portibility. I got my EAD in Oct 12th 2007. In the labor(used a pre-approved labor), the base pay mentioned is 48K and I was getting paid 55K from my current employer(A) who filed my green card.
I am getting another job in company (B) in the same field. The salary offer is better but is very high than mentioned in my labor. The new salary is around 85K.
1) Will the high salary will cause any issue with green card process if I take AC21 and use my EAD. Anyone had this kind of experience with the salary difference.
2) How do I know my new job is in the same or similar category as defined by USCIS.
3) Is AC21 is safe to take.
Thanks.....
hair Summer Fest grounds and the
Macaca
03-18 07:25 AM
Some paras from Congress's Oversight Offensive (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601989.html), By David S. Broder (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/david+s.+broder/), Sunday, March 18, 2007
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
more...
kirupa
03-27 12:45 AM
Added :)
hot Summerfest grounds with
excogitator
10-30 02:31 PM
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/9594/frogprince.png
Am I your prince? Am I not? Go ahead and Find out.
Guaranteed never to work so expect loads of kisses :)
Am I your prince? Am I not? Go ahead and Find out.
Guaranteed never to work so expect loads of kisses :)
more...
house Summerfest grounds Sunday,
MXN
04-19 07:31 PM
Well.....this is 1st attempt
tattoo Summerfest grounds this
Blog Feeds
06-28 03:20 PM
I just had a consultation this week with an engineer working on an H-1B for several years with one of America's best known companies. He's got an unusual skill set that makes him highly valuable to the company and he is a good candidate for eventually getting a green card, something he and his company both want to see happen. Unfortunately, he's in a green card category that will be backlogged for several yaers. But this fellow is facing a real problem. He has three teenage children and is facing paying out of state tuition costs for the universities in...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/wa.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/wa.html)
more...
pictures to the Summerfest grounds.
venumadhavb4u
02-06 11:17 PM
Hi,
My wife was in US in Oct 2007 on H4 Visa and went back in Mar '08 while she was in US we applied her H1B in 2008 and was approved and she got her H1B stamped in India and came back to US in Oct 2008. since she did not find any job, her payroll is not running and the her employer wants her to switch back to H4 Visa, and once she finds a project she can change her status back to H1B.
My Question here is
1) For COS from H1B to H4, Does she need Pay stubs? and how easy it is for the COS?
2) Her Employer says that she can apply for H4 Stamping and inform the Visa Officer that during her stay in US she did not join the company for medical reasons. Does this create any issues with her H1B.
3) Can Some one suggest a good immigration Lawyer in San Diego?
Thanks
My wife was in US in Oct 2007 on H4 Visa and went back in Mar '08 while she was in US we applied her H1B in 2008 and was approved and she got her H1B stamped in India and came back to US in Oct 2008. since she did not find any job, her payroll is not running and the her employer wants her to switch back to H4 Visa, and once she finds a project she can change her status back to H1B.
My Question here is
1) For COS from H1B to H4, Does she need Pay stubs? and how easy it is for the COS?
2) Her Employer says that she can apply for H4 Stamping and inform the Visa Officer that during her stay in US she did not join the company for medical reasons. Does this create any issues with her H1B.
3) Can Some one suggest a good immigration Lawyer in San Diego?
Thanks
dresses on the Summerfest grounds
PDOCT05
08-28 09:19 AM
Has anyone that sent his/her July I485 application to NSC and expect this application to have been transfered to TSC, received a receipt?
Check this thread you will find several..,
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11813
Check this thread you will find several..,
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11813
more...
makeup the Summerfest grounds for
franklin
08-13 02:12 AM
Me too
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
girlfriend Share | twitter. Henry W.
kshitijnt
04-26 06:42 PM
Hello Gurus:
I am self filing my EAD/AP: Following documents I have attached to both EAD and AP.
1. Copy of previous EAD/AP (both front and back)
2. Copy of 485 receipt notice
3. Copy of DL/ passport, Visa stamp
4. Copy of I-94 front and back
5. Letter stating why AP is required
6. Letter requesting fee exemption due to filing under new fee structure.
Can I send all applications in one packet? Or should I send them in separate packets?
I am self filing my EAD/AP: Following documents I have attached to both EAD and AP.
1. Copy of previous EAD/AP (both front and back)
2. Copy of 485 receipt notice
3. Copy of DL/ passport, Visa stamp
4. Copy of I-94 front and back
5. Letter stating why AP is required
6. Letter requesting fee exemption due to filing under new fee structure.
Can I send all applications in one packet? Or should I send them in separate packets?
hairstyles the Summerfest grounds,
seeking_GC
09-13 04:43 PM
where is this info posted?
If it is true then we should make some efforts to get our points in.
Core members, your opinion on this?
If it is true then we should make some efforts to get our points in.
Core members, your opinion on this?
devs
06-26 05:29 AM
hi,
My h1 is approved in this years quota but i have not received I797. During this period if my h4 is stamped will my h1 be cancelled. or can i go to US on
h4 and then change my status to h1 ?
My h1 is approved in this years quota but i have not received I797. During this period if my h4 is stamped will my h1 be cancelled. or can i go to US on
h4 and then change my status to h1 ?
sapota
10-22 05:43 PM
I wonder if they are approving I-140s for people whose priority dates are current to expedite their GC approval. Have you already done your finger printing?
No comments:
Post a Comment